Zochert v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Company
South Dakota Supreme Court
576 N.W.2d 531 (1998)
- Written by Genan Zilkha, JD
Facts
Ivan and Neil Zochert, d/b/a Zochert Farms, Inc. (Zochert) (plaintiff), had a farmowner’s insurance policy with National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Company (National) (defendant). On May 17, 1996, two 20-year-old silos covered by Zochert’s policy with National were damaged. National’s adjustor estimated the cost of rebuilding the silos to be $15,255.76. The adjuster also calculated the depreciation of the silos to be $5,166.96. National’s adjuster deducted the depreciation amount and the $250 deductible from the replacement cost, leaving a total amount of $9,838.80, which National paid to Zochert for its loss. Zochert and National agreed that Zochert was entitled to the actual cash value of the damaged property up to the policy limit, which was $35,000 per silo, but disagreed about whether depreciation should be deducted from the calculation of the actual cash value. Zochert sued National to recover $5,166.96, the depreciation amount deducted by National. Zochert and National both filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted Zochert’s summary judgment motion, holding that the purpose of the insurance was to permit the insured to rebuild following a loss. The trial court reasoned that if Zochert did not receive the full cash-replacement value of the silos, it would be unable to properly rebuild. In so holding, the trial court stated that insureds who faithfully pay their insurance premiums should be given the benefit of their bargain. National appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.