Zonstien v. Military Advocate General
Israel Supreme Court
HCJ 7622/02 (2002)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
A group of reservists in the Israel Defense Forces were ordered to report for duty to provide military services in a politically contentious area. The reservists refused to serve in that area, claiming that they had conscientious objections to Israel’s military activity there. The reservists were all convicted of refusing to comply with military orders and sentenced to a range of 28 to 35 days of confinement. Seven of the reservists (plaintiffs) asked the military advocate general (defendant) to vacate their judgments, arguing that the orders were (1) illegal because Israel’s military activity in that area was illegal and (2) invalid because the orders violated the reservists’ right to freedom of conscience. The military advocate general refused the request, finding that the military activity was legal and that selective conscientious objectors, i.e., people who objected to selected forms of military service instead of all military service, did not have a right to refuse to obey military orders. The seven reservists petitioned the Israel Supreme Court for relief from their convictions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barak, J.)
Concurrence (Beinisch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.