Zonstien v. Military Advocate General

HCJ 7622/02 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Zonstien v. Military Advocate General

Israel Supreme Court
HCJ 7622/02 (2002)

Facts

A group of reservists in the Israel Defense Forces were ordered to report for duty to provide military services in a politically contentious area. The reservists refused to serve in that area, claiming that they had conscientious objections to Israel’s military activity there. The reservists were all convicted of refusing to comply with military orders and sentenced to a range of 28 to 35 days of confinement. Seven of the reservists (plaintiffs) asked the military advocate general (defendant) to vacate their judgments, arguing that the orders were (1) illegal because Israel’s military activity in that area was illegal and (2) invalid because the orders violated the reservists’ right to freedom of conscience. The military advocate general refused the request, finding that the military activity was legal and that selective conscientious objectors, i.e., people who objected to selected forms of military service instead of all military service, did not have a right to refuse to obey military orders. The seven reservists petitioned the Israel Supreme Court for relief from their convictions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Barak, J.)

Concurrence (Beinisch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership