ZPR Investment Management Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
861 F.3d 1239 (2017)

- Written by Craig Scheer, JD
Facts
ZPR Investment Management, Inc. (ZPRIM) (defendant), an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff), published advertisements claiming it complied with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS), a set of voluntary performance standards widely used in the investment-management industry. Under GIPS guidelines, an advertisement claiming GIPS compliance must include information about the investment manager’s performance over multiple specified time periods. Most of ZPRIM’s advertisements claiming GIPS compliance omitted the required GIPS performance data, though ZPRIM later sent a fact sheet containing the required GIPS performance data to prospective investors. The SEC issued an administrative order against ZPRIM for violating § 206 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act), finding that ZPRIM’s advertised claims of GIPS compliance were materially false. ZPRIM appealed the SEC’s order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.