Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC (Zubulake I)

217 F.R.D. 309 (2003)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC (Zubulake I)

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

217 F.R.D. 309 (2003)

Play video

Facts

Laura Zubulake (plaintiff) filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleging gender discrimination and retaliatory firing by UBS Warburg LLC (UBS) (defendant). Zubulake sued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII), New York state law, and New York City administrative regulations. During discovery, Zubulake requested all documents in which UBS employees discussed Zubulake, including “electronic or computerized data compilations.” UBS objected, but produced 100 pages of emails. The parties agreed in a conference with a magistrate that UBS would produce “responsive emails if…possible” for individuals named by Zubulake, but UBS later asserted that its initial production fulfilled the agreement. UBS did not search backup tapes and claimed that the cost to do so would be about $300,000. Zubulake objected and produced 450 pages of emails. In deposition, a UBS employee testified that emails covered by the request were copied periodically and stored on 94 backup tapes, which are costly and time-consuming to restore, and that the external emails of registered traders are stored on optical disks. Zubulake seeks production of all remaining emails at UBS’s expense, and UBS argues that discovery is complete or that the costs should be shifted to Zubulake under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scheindlin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership