Zuckerman v. Alter

615 So. 2d 661 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Zuckerman v. Alter

Florida Supreme Court
615 So. 2d 661 (1993)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Celia Kahn’s will devised her residuary estate to her nieces, Sharon Zuckerman and Beverly Kanter (plaintiffs). Kahn placed her brokerage account, which was her most valuable asset, into a revocable inter vivos trust under which the trust assets would pass to Jack Alter (defendant) upon her death. Kahn was the trust’s settlor, sole trustee, and lifetime beneficiary. The trust was signed by Kahn and notarized in Florida, but its execution was not witnessed. Following Kahn’s death, Zuckerman and Kanter petitioned to have the trust invalidated because it contained testamentary aspects but failed to comply with Florida’s will-execution requirements. The circuit court held that the trust was invalid and ruled that the brokerage account must pass through the residuary estate. Alter appealed, and the district court reversed, ruling the trust was valid as executed because it did not contain testamentary aspects and complied with Florida’s execution requirements for revocable trusts established by a settlor who was also the sole trustee. The district court then certified a question to the Florida Supreme Court as to what test should be used to determine the validity of revocable trusts for which the settlor was the sole trustee.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McDonald, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership