From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Zuckerman v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
307 F.Supp.3d 304 (2018)
In the early 1900s, the Leffmans were Jewish citizens of Germany who owned several valuable assets, including a painting by Pablo Picasso. In 1935, the German Nazi government forced the Leffmans to sell most of their assets to parties of the government’s choosing for virtually no compensation. However, the Leffmans had sent the Picasso painting to a non-Jewish friend in Switzerland for safekeeping, and it was not confiscated. The Leffmans then fled to Italy. In 1936, the Leffmans began efforts to sell the Picasso painting to raise funds, rejecting at least one unfavorable offer. As time went by, the Leffmans realized that they needed to flee Italy or risk possible death, but it would take significant funds. The Leffmans liquidated some Italian properties. The Leffmans also stepped up their efforts to sell the Picasso painting, entertaining discussions with at least two different art dealers. In 1938, the Leffmans sold the Picasso painting to a dealer named Kate Perls for $13,200, less a commission, for a net sum of $12,000. The Leffmans then used the money to flee to Brazil. The Picasso painting exchanged hands and, in 1941, was sold for $22,500 to a buyer who donated it to The Metropolitan Museum of Art (defendant) in 1952. Later, Laurel Zuckerman sued the museum on behalf of the estate of an heir of the Leffmans (plaintiff). Zuckerman argued that the Leffmans had sold the painting to Perls in 1938 due to severe economic distress and not of their own free will. Therefore, the sale contract was void, and the painting still belonged to the Leffmans.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Preska, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.