Zuniga v. United States

996 F.2d 1203 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Zuniga v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
996 F.2d 1203 (1993)

Facts

Refractarios Monterrey, S.A. (Refractarios) (plaintiff) produced kiln furniture in Mexico using raw materials from the United States. Specifically, Refractarios added dry clay and talc from the United States to water and dispersing agents to make casting slip, which was then placed into molds, dried, and fired in kilns. When Refractarios and F. F. Zuniga (plaintiff) sought to import the furniture into the United States, the United States Customs Service (Customs) (defendant) said that the furniture was dutiable at a rate of 7.5 percent. Refractarios and Zuniga asserted that the furniture should be duty free under the General System of Preferences (GSP). Under the GSP’s origin rules, a product from a beneficiary developing country, like Mexico, was eligible for duty-free entry into the United States only if the total cost or value of the materials and production in Mexico was at least 35 percent of the product’s appraised value. Refractarios and Zuniga could not meet that 35 percent threshold unless the United States-based raw materials were treated as materials originating from Mexico. Refractarios and Zuniga argued that the dry clay and talc from the United States had been substantially transformed into a new and different article of commerce (i.e., the casting slip) during the manufacturing process and thus could be treated as materials produced in Mexico. Customs rejected that argument and denied duty-free status. In proceedings before the Court of International Trade, Refractarios and Zuniga asserted that making casting slip from dry ingredients required significant experience. Refractarios also presented testimony and evidence suggesting that casting slip could be sold in the market. However, other evidence indicated that casting slip could not be sold at competitive prices and could lead to the disclosure of the seller’s confidential information. The court upheld Customs’ determination, concluding that the dry clay and talc had not been substantially transformed into a new and different article of commerce. Refractarios and Zuniga appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Archer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership