Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

A.H. Robins Co. v. Piccinin

788 F.2d 994 (1986)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...

A.H. Robins Co. v. Piccinin

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

788 F.2d 994 (1986)

Facts

In the 1970s and early 1980s, A.H. Robins Co. (Robins) (plaintiff) was subjected to thousands of lawsuits alleging injury from its Dalkon Shield intrauterine contraceptive devices. In August 1985, Robins filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. By that point, Robins and its insurer, Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Aetna), had paid out more than $517 million in judgments and settlements, with additional suits and claims still pending. More than half of the pending actions were against Robins as the sole defendant; these were automatically stayed by the filing of the bankruptcy petition. The remaining suits included one or more codefendants who were not bankrupt, including two Robins family members, two doctors associated with the Dalkon Shield device, and Aetna. The plaintiffs in a number of these suits moved to sever their actions against Robins in order to proceed against the codefendants. In response, Robins filed an action against Piccinin and other plaintiffs in eight such suits (defendants). Robins sought (1) a declaration that its Aetna products liability policy was property of the bankruptcy estate and (2) injunctive relief staying actions against Robins’ codefendants. The district court ruled in favor of Robins on both counts. Piccinin and the other defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Russell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,500 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership