Aiken Industries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

56 T.C. 925 (1971)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Aiken Industries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
56 T.C. 925 (1971)

Facts

Aiken Industries, Inc. (plaintiff) (Aiken), incorporated in the United States, was the parent and sole stockholder of another United States corporation, Mechanical Products, Inc. (MPI). MPI was the parent and almost sole owner of Ecuadorian Corporation, Ltd. (ECL), incorporated in the Bahamas. Compania de Cervezas Nacionales (CCN), incorporated in Ecuador, was the wholly owned subsidiary of ECL. MPI borrowed $2.25 million from ECL in 1963, giving ECL a 4 percent promissory note to acknowledge the debt. In 1964, Industrias, wholly owned by CCN, was incorporated in Honduras. ECL transferred the promissory note to Industrias. Industrias gave ECL nine notes, payable on demand, with a principal amount of $250,000 at a 4 percent interest rate. Internal Revenue Code §§ 1441(a) and 1441(b) required withholding of taxes on payment of income, including interest, to foreign partnerships and nonresident aliens. If income of a type described in § 1441 was paid to a foreign corporation, § 1442(a) required withholding of a tax of 30 percent at the source. The United States-Honduras Income Tax Convention (convention) was in effect in 1964 and 1965. The convention’s Article IX provided that interest paid by a United States corporation and “received” by a Honduran corporation with no permanent presence in the United States was exempt from United States tax. Sections 1441 and 1442 would have obliged MPI to withhold tax on interest payments to Industrias. MPI did not withhold this tax, asserting that it was exempt from withholding under Article IX. Aiken, a successor to MPI, denied liability for the tax. The commissioner of Internal Revenue (commissioner) (defendant) urged the court to disregard Industrias’s corporate structure and to treat ECL as the recipient of the interest payments, ultimately holding Aiken liable for the tax.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Quealy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership