From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
797 F.3d 1020, 116 U.S.P.Q.2d 1344 (Fed.Cir.2015)(en banc)
Akamai Technologies, Inc. (plaintiff) owned a patent claiming methods for delivering internet content, including steps for tagging and serving such content. Akamai sued Limelight Networks, Inc. (defendant), for patent infringement. At trial, evidence established that as part of Limelight’s content delivery service, Limelight’s customers tagged and served internet content delivered by Limelight’s network. Additionally, Limelight required customers to execute a contract outlining the steps customers must perform to use Limelight’s service, including tagging and serving content. Limelight also instructed customers how to use the service, including tagging and serving content, and explained that a Limelight account manager would direct service implementation. The district judge instructed the jury that Limelight’s customers’ performance of the tagging and serving steps of the patented method could be attributed to Limelight, and Limelight thus could be found to have directly infringed Akamai’s patent, if Limelight directed or controlled its customers’ activities. The jury found that Limelight infringed the patent. The district court granted Limelight’s motion for judgment as a matter of law and entered judgment of noninfringement. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the district court, but the United States Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit and remanded for the court to reconsider the scope of divided infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.