Alison D. v. Virginia M.

572 N.E.2d 27 (1991)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Alison D. v. Virginia M.

New York Court of Appeals
572 N.E.2d 27 (1991)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1980, Alison D. (plaintiff) and Virginia M. (defendant) agreed to raise a child together and share all parental rights and responsibilities. Virginia became pregnant through artificial insemination and gave birth to ADM. Alison and Virginia cared for and supported ADM together during the first two years of his life. In 1983, Alison and Virginia ended their relationship and Alison moved out of the family home. Alison continued to visit ADM multiple times per week and continued to pay for half of the mortgage and other household expenses. In 1986, Virginia eventually bought out Alison’s interest in the family home and Alison later moved to Ireland for work. By this time, ADM was over six years old and referred to both Alison and Virginia as mommy. However, following Alison’s move, Virginia began restricting Alison’s communication with ADM and eventually terminated all contact. In response, Alison petitioned for visitation rights under New York’s Domestic Relations Law § 70, under which a parent may petition for a court determination relating to her guardianship, charge, and custody of her child. The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division found that Alison did not have standing to seek visitation rights under Section 70 because she was not a parent for the purposes of the statute. Alison appealed on the ground that she was a de facto parent or, alternatively, was a parent by estoppel.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Dissent (Kaye, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership