Alliance for Community Media v. Federal Communications Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
529 F.3d 763 (2008)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The 1992 Cable Act amended § 621(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934. The amendment sought to spur cable competition by removing any limitations on local franchising authorities (LFAs) granting a license to more than one cable operator in their territories. The amendment provided that an LFA could not unreasonably refuse to grant an additional license. After the amendment alone did not increase cable competition, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) opened a rulemaking to further the amendment’s purpose. In 2006, the FCC issued an order that, among other things, imposed timeframes within which an LFA must respond to license applications and placed limits on buildout requirements an LFA could impose on a cable operator as a condition of a new license. The Alliance for Community Media (plaintiff) filed a petition for review of the order in federal court, arguing that (1) the FCC did not have authority to impose the rules because the FCC did not appear in § 621(a)(1), and (2) even if the FCC had authority, its interpretation of § 621(a)(1) was unreasonable.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cole, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.