Amend16RobertWirengard v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2005-30 (2005)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Amend16RobertWirengard (Amend16) (plaintiff) applied for exemption from federal income taxation under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (code). The application described Amend16 as a free Internet school offering financial-education services. Amend16’s articles of organization stated that it was organized for charitable purposes, including the provision of economic and financial education and other assistance to low-income individuals. Amend16’s bylaws created five divisions for the organization, one of which was United Bank. According to Amend16’s website, United Bank would provide banking products and services to individuals and businesses, including microloans intended to help low-income individuals. A sample note for such a microloan provided for a 6 percent interest rate. United Bank was neither incorporated nor a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) found that United Bank did not further an exempt purpose and denied Amend16’s application. Amend16 then sought declaratory relief to the effect that it was entitled to the tax exemption.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wells, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

