American General Finance, Inc. v. Bassett (In re Bassett)

285 F.3d 882 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American General Finance, Inc. v. Bassett (In re Bassett)

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
285 F.3d 882 (2002)

Facts

Darlene Bassett (debtor) filed for bankruptcy. Bassett owed money to American General Finance, Inc. (Finance) (creditor). In the bankruptcy action, Bassett signed an agreement reaffirming her promise to pay Finance an agreed amount of money. Under federal law, this agreement would be enforceable after Bassett’s bankruptcy discharge only if it contained clear and conspicuous statements that Bassett had a right to rescind the agreement within 60 days or any time before her bankruptcy discharge. The agreement that Bassett signed was two pages long. The top three-fourths of the first page contained only blanks for specific details, like her name and the relevant numbers, and white space. The bottom fourth of the first page contained three preprinted sentences. The first two sentences were in ordinary lowercase sentence formatting. The very first sentence provided the required right-to-rescind statement. The second sentence stated that any rescission would be a default of the reaffirmation agreement. The third sentence was written in all capital letters and affirmed that Bassett knew that she was not legally obligated to sign the agreement. The second page of the agreement contained a declaration from Bassett’s attorney that she had been advised of her legal rights and signature lines. After Bassett’s bankruptcy was discharged, she eventually stopped paying Finance. Finance attempted to collect its debt. Bassett reopened her bankruptcy action and filed unlawful-collection claims against Finance. Bassett argued that Finance’s collection efforts were unlawful because (1) it was trying to collect under the reaffirmation agreement and (2) that agreement violated federal law because the right-to-rescind statement was not conspicuous. The bankruptcy court found the statement was conspicuous and dismissed the claims. The bankruptcy appellate panel reversed the dismissal, finding that the right-to-rescind sentence was not conspicuous because it was written in lowercase and overshadowed by the nearby all-capital sentence. Finance appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kozinski, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership