American Plywood Association v. United States
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
267 F. Supp. 830 (1967)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
The American Plywood Association (the association) (plaintiff) existed to promote the common business interests of the plywood industry and was instrumental in the significant growth of that industry during the twentieth century. In 1961, members of the association produced more than 92 percent of the plywood manufactured in the United States. Also in 1961, the association increased its membership dues so it could devote more resources to promoting a type of plywood bearing a trademark that only members of the association were permitted to use. None of the association’s advertising mentioned individual members. Among the other services the association provided to its members was quality control. This included the development of commercial standards and inspection and testing processes under which plywood was accorded government approval and gained public acceptance as a building material. The association was an exempt business league under § 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) reexamined and revoked the association’s tax-exempt status in 1963 because it determined the association’s promotional and quality-control services were not exempt activities. The association paid taxes that the IRS alleged were owed and then sued for a refund.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boldt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.