American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign v. Jewell
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
847 F.3d 1174 (2016)
- Written by Colette Routel, JD
Facts
An area of land in southwestern Wyoming was known as the “Checkerboard” because prior federal policies (e.g., land grants to railroads) had resulted in alternating sections of private and public lands. Federal law precluded landowners from erecting fences around their lands in the Checkerboard, because doing so would prevent any access to the adjacent public lands. A private landowner in the Checkerboard requested that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) round up and remove wild horses located not only on his private lands, but on neighboring public lands, pursuant to § 4 of the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 (WFRHBA). The BLM agreed to do so, even though removing wild horses from public lands normally required the agency to make specific factual findings under § 3 of the WFRHBA. The BLM claimed that applying the requirements contained in § 3 of the WFRHBA was unworkable given the checkerboarded nature of land ownership in this area, because by the time officials arrived at the location, the wild horses were likely to have moved onto different public or private lands. The BLM claimed that Congress did not contemplate this unique factual situation and that wild horses should be removed from public lands without making the findings in § 3, so long as the purpose of the removal was to ensure that those horses would not trespass on private lands. Wild-horse-advocacy organizations and photographers (plaintiffs) sued Sally Jewell, the secretary of the Department of the Interior, and Neil Kornze, the acting director of the BLM (defendants) to challenge the BLM’s decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Briscoe, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.