Anchorage Police Department Employees Association v. Feichtinger
Alaska Supreme Court
994 P. 2d 376 (1999)
- Written by Mike Begovic, JD
Facts
Eric Feichtinger (plaintiff) was terminated from his job as a police officer with the Anchorage Police Department for alleged criminal activity. A collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) between the Anchorage Police Department Employees Association (the union) (defendant) and the city of Anchorage authorized an employee to pursue arbitration without union representation if the union declined to pursue the grievance. The union chose not to accept Feichtinger’s grievance, even after he was acquitted of all criminal charges. At the outset of arbitration, Feichtinger asked for a postponement until he could bring legal action against the union in order to obtain resources for an attorney. The arbitrator declined, Feichtinger walked out of the hearing, and the arbitration proceeded without him. Feichtinger then filed a pro se brief with the arbitrator. After his discharge was upheld, Feichtinger brought an action in state court against the municipality of Anchorage, the state of Alaska, various officials, the arbitrator, and the union. All defendants except the union were dismissed. The union filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the arbitrator’s finding of just cause for the termination precluded further litigation of the issue and that the record showed the union did not breach its duty. The trial court denied the motion. The union appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Estaugh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.