Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Anderson v. Somberg

338 A.2d 1, 423 U.S. 929 (1975)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 32,200+ case briefs...

Anderson v. Somberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

338 A.2d 1, 423 U.S. 929 (1975)

Facts

Henry Anderson (plaintiff) had a back operation at St. James Hospital (defendant). The operation was performed by Dr. Somberg (defendant). Among the tools that the surgeon used during the operation was a pituitary rongeur, manufactured by Lawton Instrument Company (defendant). The hospital had purchased the rongeur from Reinhold-Schumann, Inc. (defendant) four years prior to Anderson’s surgery. The rongeur had been used in many surgeries by about 20 different surgeons. During Anderson’s operation, the tip of the rongeur broke off inside Anderson’s spinal canal. Dr. Somberg tried several times to retrieve the metal fragment but was unsuccessful. The fragment remained in Anderson’s back, requiring Anderson to undergo additional surgeries. Anderson sued the surgeon for malpractice, the hospital for negligence, the rongeur’s manufacturer for strict liability in tort, and the rongeur’s distributor for breach of warranty. The jury found that Anderson had failed to state a cause of action against all four defendants. Anderson appealed. The court of appeals held that the jury should have been instructed that any of the four defendants that failed to prove its non-culpability should be held liable. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pashman, J.)

Dissent (Mountain, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 585,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 32,200 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership