Applegate v. Scherer

332 F.2d 571 (1964)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Applegate v. Scherer

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
332 F.2d 571 (1964)

  • Written by Jack Newell, JD

Facts

Sea lampreys were causing serious problems in the Great Lakes. The Fish and Wildlife Service, led by Vernon Applegate (plaintiff), solicited methods for reducing the lamprey population. Otto Scherer (defendant) proposed a chemical compound that would be effective for killing the larvae of sea lamprey, and he sent the Fish and Wildlife Service a sample. Both Applegate and Scherer submitted patent applications for the chemical to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). The PTO declared an interference as a result of two parties submitting the same patent. The Board of Patent Interferences gave the patent to Scherer, finding he was the actual inventor of the chemical. Applegate appealed to the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rich, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership