Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)
International Court of Justice
2007 I.C.J. 191 (2007)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Unrest within the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia resulted in multiple republics, including Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosnia) (plaintiff), declaring independence. Armed conflict ensued. In 1993, Bosnia brought suit against Serbia and Montenegro (Serbia) (defendant) in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), alleging that Serbia violated the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide Convention). Specifically, Bosnia alleged that Serbia was committing genocide, or conspiring with or aiding individuals to commit genocide, against Bosnia’s Muslim population. Bosnia also alleged that Serbia was violating its obligation to prevent and punish genocide. In 1995, while the case was ongoing, thousands of Bosnian Muslims were killed in the village of Srebrenica by Bosnian Serb forces known to be influenced by the Serbian government. The ICJ considered the case.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.