From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society
United States Supreme Court
457 U.S. 332 (1982)
Facts
Around 1,750 doctors in Maricopa County, Arizona, joined the Maricopa Foundation for Medical Care (the Foundation) (defendant). The Foundation established a set of maximum fees that member-doctors could accept as payment for medical services that were provided to patients covered by medical-insurance plans approved by the Foundation. The individual member-doctors had no financial interest in the operation of the Foundation, but the Foundation was authorized to collect payment from the accounts of insurance companies to compensate member-doctors for services that were provided to patients with approved medical insurance. Patients who had Foundation-approved medical insurance and saw member-doctors were guaranteed complete coverage for medical services at prices listed in the Foundation’s fee schedule. The State of Arizona (plaintiff) believed that the Foundation’s fee schedule was actually increasing prices charged by physicians, which in turn increased insurance premiums paid by patients. In an attempt to shut down the program, Arizona brought a suit against the Foundation, alleging that the fee schedule violated antitrust law.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.