Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union (I)

535 U.S. 564 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union (I)

United States Supreme Court
535 U.S. 564 (2002)

Play video

Facts

Congress enacted the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) in response to concerns that children were able to access pornography online. COPA restricted the transmission of material deemed harmful to minors. COPA defined this material as any communication that: (1) the average person applying contemporary community standards would find appeals to the prurient interest, (2) depicts a sexual act in a manner patently offensive with respect to minors, and (3) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) (plaintiff) sued the United States (defendant), claiming that COPA’s use of community standards to identify material that is harmful to minors violated the First Amendment. The trial court and the appellate court both ruled in favor of the ACLU, holding that COPA imposed an overreaching burden and restriction on constitutionally protected speech. The United States Supreme Court granted the government’s petition for certiorari to review the First Amendment challenge to COPA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)

Concurrence (Breyer, J.)

Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership