AT&T Corp. v. FCC
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
323 F.3d 1081 (2003)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
AT&T Corp. (plaintiff) was a telecommunications carrier. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) issued a notice of apparent liability and assessed a $80,000 forfeiture penalty against AT&T for changing the service of two customers without the authorization of the customers. The FCC claimed that AT&T’s failure to obtain actual authorization from its customers violated § 258 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which makes it illegal for a telecommunications carrier to change a customer’s service unless the carrier complies with the FCC’s procedures. AT&T paid the forfeiture amount and appealed the propriety of the forfeiture to the court of appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tatel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.