AT & T Mobility, LLC v. T-Mobile USA Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
2023 WL 186809 (2023)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
AT & T Mobility LLC (AT&T) (plaintiff) was a Delaware corporation and had a principal place of business in Georgia. T-Mobile USA, Inc. (T-Mobile) (defendant) was a Delaware corporation and had a principal place of business in Washington. T-Mobile ran an advertising campaign stating that AT&T offered senior discounts only in Florida. AT&T responded that it offered senior discounts throughout the country through the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP). AT&T sued T-Mobile in Texas district court for false advertising. T-Mobile filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. AT&T argued that the Texas court had personal jurisdiction over T-Mobile given T-Mobile’s presence in Texas, including income-generating customers, cell towers, retail stores, employees, and a website designed for the advertising campaign, www.BannedSeniors.com. The website presented switching to T-Mobile as an option for seniors and included a link to T-Mobile’s main website, at which a switch could be accomplished. T-Mobile argued that the website was passive advertising that did not target Texas any more than it targeted any other state.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mazzant, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.