Baptist Memorial Hospital System v. Sampson

969 S.W.2d 945 (1998)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Baptist Memorial Hospital System v. Sampson

Texas Supreme Court
969 S.W.2d 945 (1998)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Rhea Brown (plaintiff) went to the emergency room at Baptist Memorial Hospital System (defendant) with a brown-recluse spider bite. A doctor diagnosed an allergic reaction, prescribed Benadryl and pain medication, and sent her home. Brown returned a day later, her condition worsening, but a second doctor simply prescribed more pain medication and again sent her home. Fourteen hours later, when Brown went to another hospital in septic shock, doctors correctly identified the bite and administered the proper life-saving treatment. Brown allegedly had continuing pain, sensitivity, breathing difficulties, and scarring from the bite. She sued the two doctors who misdiagnosed her and claimed the hospital held vicarious liability as their employer. The hospital moved for summary judgment based on evidence that the doctors were independent contractors, not its employees. Brown had signed consent forms advising her of that fact, and signs were posted in the emergency room. Brown claimed she never read the forms or saw the signs, did not choose which doctors treated her, and believed they were hospital employees. The trial court granted summary judgment for the hospital and Brown appealed. The appellate court reversed, reasoning that hospitals have a nondelegable duty for malpractice of emergency-room doctors, prompting a further appeal to the Texas Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Phillips, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership