Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

Bartus v. Riccardi

City Court, City of Utica, New York
284 N.Y.S.2d 222 (1967)


Facts

Frank Riccardi (defendant) purchased a Model A-660 Acousticon hearing aid from Frank Bartus (plaintiff), a licensed representative of Acousticon, making a down payment of $80. When the hearing aid was delivered, however, it was a Model A-665, which was represented to be a newer, improved version of the A-660. Riccardi was fitted with the aid, but it immediately bothered him. Approximately one week after receiving it, he returned the hearing aid to Bartus, complaining about headaches it caused and that it was not the model he ordered. Bartus offered to obtain an A-660, to which Riccardi did not respond affirmatively or negatively. Neither party expressed anything about canceling their existing contract. Bartus immediately contacted Acousticon, which promptly sent a letter to Riccardi offering to deliver the A-660 or a replacement of the A-665 he had been given. Riccardi declined to accept either, and Bartus then sued him for the balance owed on their contract. The trial court considered the principal legal issue of the case.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Hymes, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.