Bartus v. Riccardi

284 N.Y.S.2d 222 (1967)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bartus v. Riccardi

City Court, City of Utica, New York
284 N.Y.S.2d 222 (1967)

Play video

Facts

Frank Riccardi (defendant) purchased a Model A-660 Acousticon hearing aid from Frank Bartus (plaintiff), a licensed representative of Acousticon, making a down payment of $80. When the hearing aid was delivered, however, it was a Model A-665, which was represented to be a newer, improved version of the A-660. Riccardi was fitted with the aid, but it immediately bothered him. Approximately one week after receiving it, he returned the hearing aid to Bartus, complaining about headaches it caused and that it was not the model he ordered. Bartus offered to obtain an A-660, to which Riccardi did not respond affirmatively or negatively. Neither party expressed anything about canceling their existing contract. Bartus immediately contacted Acousticon, which promptly sent a letter to Riccardi offering to deliver the A-660 or a replacement of the A-665 he had been given. Riccardi declined to accept either, and Bartus then sued him for the balance owed on their contract. The trial court considered the principal legal issue of the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hymes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership