Baughman v. Walt Disney World Co.

685 F.3d 1131 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Baughman v. Walt Disney World Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
685 F.3d 1131 (2012)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

The Walt Disney World Company (Disney) (defendant) maintained a policy permitting wheelchairs and motorized scooters inside its Disneyland property but prohibiting the use of two-wheeled vehicles and devices. Tina Baughman (plaintiff) suffered from a form of muscular dystrophy that made it difficult for her to stand from a sitting position or to walk. In anticipation of taking her daughter to Disneyland, Baughman contacted Disney, explained her condition, and requested permission to use a Segway, a two-wheeled mobility device operated in a standing position. Disney refused, and Baughman filed a lawsuit claiming that Disney violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by denying her full and equal access to Disneyland. The district court found in favor of Disney, finding that Disney was not required to modify its vehicle policy because the policy permitted wheelchairs and scooters. That is, because Baughman could access Disneyland via a wheelchair or scooter, a Segway was not necessary for her to use the park. Baughman appealed to the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kozinski, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership