Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
92 T.C. 525 (1989)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (B&L) (plaintiff) manufactured and sold contact lenses in the United States and abroad. Bausch & Lomb Ireland, Ltd. (B&L Ireland) was a subsidiary of B&L. B&L formed B&L Ireland to expand manufacturing capacity abroad, meet foreign demand, and provide an alternative supply source if B&L’s production facility in the United States was disrupted. B&L and B&L Ireland entered into a licensing agreement that permitted B&L Ireland to use B&L’s proprietary technology for making contact lenses in Ireland. The licensing agreement also gave B&L Ireland permission to use B&L’s trademarks. In exchange, B&L Ireland paid B&L a royalty rate of five percent of B&L Ireland’s sales. B&L Ireland manufactured contact lenses in Ireland, all sold to B&L or B&L’s foreign affiliates for $7.50 per lens. B&L was not required to purchase the lenses from B&L Ireland. B&L effectively functioned as B&L Ireland’s distributor abroad, and the $7.50 sales price was similar to what B&L Ireland would have charged other buyers. B&L would have needed a 20 percent royalty to repay investors in the contact-lens-manufacturing operations. After B&L filed tax returns, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) made an allocation of the income between B&L and B&L Ireland based on the sale price and the royalty and determined that B&L owed more taxes. B&L petitioned for judicial review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Körner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

