Belden Inc. v. American Electronic Components, Inc.

885 N.E.2d 751 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Belden Inc. v. American Electronic Components, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals
885 N.E.2d 751 (2008)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Play video

Facts

American Electronic Components, Inc. (AEC) (plaintiff) manufactured automobile sensors. AEC purchased wire from Belden Inc. (defendant). In the 1990s, Belden assured AEC that Belden used a particular type of insulation to make the wire. Typically, AEC would send a purchase-order form with AEC’s terms and conditions on the back page. Belden would then respond with a customer-order acknowledgement. This acknowledgement form contained boilerplate language on the back that limited Belden’s liability. Belden’s customer-order acknowledgement also stated that Belden’s acceptance of the order “is expressly made conditional upon Buyer’s assent solely to the terms of [Belden’s form],” including this new term limiting Belden’s liability. In 2003, Belden sold wire to AEC that used the wrong insulation. The insulation cracked when used for sensors in thousands of cars, and AEC was responsible for the cost of the recalls and repairs. AEC sued Belden for breach of contract, and the trial court granted AEC’s motion for partial summary judgment. Belden appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Barnes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership