Bell v. Southwell

376 F.2d 659 (1967)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bell v. Southwell

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
376 F.2d 659 (1967)

  • Written by Philip Glass, JD

Facts

In a 1965 Justice of the Peace special election, an African American woman, Mrs. Bell (plaintiff), ran as one of the candidates and lost. The voter-registration rolls listed 1,223 African Americans eligible to vote. The election was decided by 2,781 total votes. Out of this total, African American voters cast 403 ballots. Mrs. Bell filed suit challenging this outcome based on racial discrimination. The cause of action alleged that the election operated with racially segregated voter lists and polling booths. Authorities prevented African American women from voting in booths reserved for White women. Mrs. Bell's complaint further alleged voter intimidation by police and White voters. Further allegations included authorities preventing Mrs. Bell's representatives from observing the polling place. The disobedience of Mrs. Bell led to her arrest. Mrs. Bell's cause of action requested the voiding of the election and the institution of a new election. The trial court found that invidious racial discrimination occurred. However, the trial court refused to invalidate the election.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership