Beneficial Maine v. Carter
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
25 A.3d 96 (2011)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Beneficial Maine Inc. (Beneficial) (plaintiff) brought an action against Timothy and Kathleen Carter (defendants) to foreclose on their home. Beneficial moved for summary judgment, using an affidavit with attached exhibits as its only evidence. This affidavit was from Shana Richmond, an employee of HSBC Consumer Lending Mortgage Servicing (HSBC), the company Beneficial used to service the Carters’ mortgage. In the affidavit, Richmond swore that (1) Beneficial owned the mortgage and the note, (2) Richmond had access to the records relating to the mortgage, (3) Richmond had personal knowledge of the Carters’ account, (4) Beneficial made the mortgage-account records at or near the time of the transactions, and (5) Beneficial kept the Carters’ mortgage-account records in the ordinary course of business. Relying on this evidence, the trial court granted summary judgment to Beneficial. The Carters appealed, arguing that the note and mortgage contained hearsay and that Richmond was not qualified to lay the entire foundation to have these documents admitted under the business-records exception.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Saufley, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.