Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,400+ case briefs...

Berckeley Investment Group, Ltd. v. Colkitt

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
455 F.3d 195 (3d Cir. 2006)


In 1996, Douglas Colkitt (defendant), the principal shareholder of National Medical Financial Services Corporation (NMFS), sought capital for a business venture by entering an agreement with Berckeley Investment Group, Ltd. (Berckeley) (plaintiff). NMFS was a corporation with shares that were traded on the stock exchange. Under the agreement, Berckeley bought $2,000,000 in NMFS debentures, which granted Berckeley the option to convert the debentures into unregistered NMFS shares at a discount from market price. The agreement provided that Berckeley could convert half the shares 100 days after the closing of the agreement and the remaining shares 20 days after that. The entire agreement was structured to qualify under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, 17 C.F.R. §§ 230.901-.04, which at that point established a 40-day restricted period on resales. The agreement specifically provided that Berckeley could not resell until 40 days after the date the offering was completed. The agreement also noted that Colkitt had relied on the accuracy of his attorneys regarding compliance with federal securities law. In 1997, the restriction period of Regulation S was expanded to one year. Berckeley gave notice of its intent to convert and receive NMFS shares, but Colkitt only allowed Berckeley to receive 18,320 shares before refusing to allow further conversion. Berckeley brought charges. Colkitt contended he was entitled to rescind the agreement pursuant to § 29(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), 15 U.S.C. § 78cc(b), because the agreement violated Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5, as well as § 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77e, and § 10(b) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Berckeley. Colkitt appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 496,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 496,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,400 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial