Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Chicago Eastern Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
863 F.2d 508 (1988)
Facts
Chicago Eastern Corp. (Chicago Eastern) (defendant) ordered steel from Bethlehem Steel Corp. (Bethlehem) (plaintiff). Chicago Eastern never paid the purchase price, and Bethlehem sued Chicago Eastern for breach of contract. Chicago Eastern counterclaimed for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, arguing the steel it received was not fit for ordinary use. Bethlehem’s steel met the technical specifications found in the contract, but Chicago Eastern presented evidence that the steel had exceptionally high nitrogen content. Chicago Eastern presented expert testimony that the steel’s high nitrogen content made the steel brittle and subject to cracking. The expert concluded that the steel could not be used for wall sheets in grain-storage tanks. Based on this, Chicago Eastern argued the steel was not “fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used,” which was the test for merchantability that applied to this dispute. The trial court found this was not enough to show Bethlehem had breached the implied warranty of merchantability and dismissed the claim. Chicago Eastern appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Flaum, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,300 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
