Bilingual Montessori School of Paris v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
75 T.C. 480 (1980)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Bilingual Montessori School of Paris, Inc. (the corporation) (plaintiff) was a nonstock, nonprofit corporation organized under Delaware law that operated a private school in Paris, France. The school’s founder, Barbara Baylor Cole Porter, obtained her international Montessori diploma in Washington, D.C., where she founded a school that closed when she moved to Paris. Porter founded a new school in Paris and incorporated it in Delaware. The corporation conducted no activities and had no officers, directors, or employees in the United States. All contributions received by the corporation were used to cover expenses associated with the school in Paris. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) granted the corporation’s application for exemption from income taxation under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (code) but determined that contributions to the corporation were not tax deductible because the corporation was not a domestic organization. The corporation sought a declaratory judgment that contributions to the corporation qualified as tax deductible. However, the commissioner argued that the corporation was nothing more than an agent or conduit for a foreign private school.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ekman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.