Billups v. Emerald Coast Utilities Authority
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
714 F. App’x 929, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21199 (2017)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
In 1995 Emerald Coast Utilities Authority (Emerald) (defendant) hired Roderick Billups (plaintiff) to repair water and sewer lines. The task was physically demanding and required heavy lifting. In December 2013, Billups sustained an on-the-job shoulder injury, which required surgery. The surgery took place in April 2014. Billups received 26 weeks of leave under Emerald’s leave policy. By June 2014, Billups was still unable to work. Emerald notified Billups that his leave was ending and he would likely be terminated because he was unable to work. Emerald held a predetermination hearing, during which Billups provided his recovery status and introduced medical reports. Emerald expressed concern that Billups was unable to perform his job, and it was uncertain when he would be able to do so. Billups later submitted a note from his physical therapist, stating that Billups’s strength was improving and that he would be able to perform his work without restrictions after completing therapy. However, Billups was required to attend physical therapy until at least mid-July, and he could only be cleared by a physician. On June 23, Emerald terminated Billups because he was unable to perform his job with or without reasonable accommodations. Billups sued Emerald in federal district court under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Billups argued that Emerald had unlawfully discriminated against him by failing to provide him with extended leave. The district court granted Emerald summary judgment. The matter was appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.