Blau v. Harrison

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19795 (2006)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
B
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Blau v. Harrison

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19795 (2006)

RW

Facts

Blau and others (shareholders) (plaintiffs) owned shares in J. P. Morgan Chase & Company (J.P. Morgan). Chief executive officer (CEO) William B. Harrison Jr. and other J.P. Morgan directors (defendants) solicited the shareholders’ proxy votes in favor of J.P. Morgan’s merger with Bank One Corporation. The proxy statement described the merger agreement as fair. However, the proxy statement failed to mention that the directors had rejected Bank One’s demand for Harrison to step down as CEO and that, in order to retain Harrison as CEO, the directors had agreed to pay a multibillion-dollar purchase premium for Bank One’s stock. When the details of this deal came to light, the shareholders filed a federal suit against the directors, accusing the directors of having issued a misleading proxy statement in violation of § 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The directors moved to dismiss the suit on the grounds that (1) the shareholders failed to specify with particularity in what ways the board acted fraudulently and (2) the board was not required to disclose its negotiating positions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hibbler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Mergers and Acquisitions

Key Terms

Related Videos