Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mississippi v. Larson

485 So. 2d 1071 (1986)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mississippi v. Larson

Mississippi Supreme Court
485 So. 2d 1071 (1986)

Facts

Carolyn Larson (plaintiff) was a bank employee and a participant in the Pascagoula-Moss Point Bank Employee Medical Expense Reimbursement Trust (trust). Larson was also covered as a dependent under a group plan administered by Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mississippi, Inc. (Blue Cross) (defendant) through her husband’s employer. The Blue Cross policy contained a coordination-of-benefits (COB) provision applicable to beneficiaries with coverage under more than one plan. The COB clause provided that if the sum of the benefits payable by Blue Cross in the absence of the COB clause and the benefits payable by the other plan in the absence of a similar provision would exceed the reasonable cost of the covered services, reimbursement would be limited to the actual cost of the services. The trust contained an other-insurance clause providing that the trust would not reimburse if a claim was covered under any other employer-sponsored insurance plan, regardless of whether the coverage was attributable to the employment of the spouse or dependent of an enrolled employee. Larson submitted a claim to Blue Cross for reimbursement of medical expenses. Blue Cross denied the claim, arguing that its obligation was secondary and that the trust was primarily liable. The trial court found that the Blue Cross coverage was primary and that the trust had contingent excess liability. The appellate court affirmed, and Blue Cross appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Patterson, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership