Board of Regents v. KST Electric, Ltd.

550 F. Supp. 2d 657 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Board of Regents v. KST Electric, Ltd.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
550 F. Supp. 2d 657 (2008)

RW

Facts

The registered trademark of University of Texas at Austin (UT) athletic teams was a stylized longhorn steer’s head. Two UT fans developed a similar logo to represent their company, KST Electric, Ltd. (KST) (defendant). On UT’s behalf, the Board of Regents of the University of Texas System (board) (plaintiff) filed a multi-count Lanham Act suit against KST. The most controversial count alleged trademark dilution, a tort redefined by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (TDRA). KST, in its defense, cited survey findings that only 5.8 percent of general consumers in the United States associated the longhorn logo exclusively with UT. The board attacked the survey’s methodology as deeply flawed. The board cited the sponsorship of UT sports teams by nationally known companies like Coca-Cola and Nike. The board also cited a survey showing that the UT logo had nearly universal recognition among nationwide fans of college football and basketball. KST moved for summary judgment on all counts. A federal magistrate judge recommended that the district court deny KST’s motion as to all counts except the trademark-dilution charge.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Yeakel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership