From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...
Bob Jones University v. United States
United States Supreme Court
461 U.S. 574 (1983)
Bob Jones University (University) (plaintiff) was a Christian-fundamentalist educational institution and a federal tax-exempt charitable organization. The University’s religious beliefs were reflected in its policies, which prohibited interracial dating and marriage among its students. In 1970, the Internal Revenue Service of the United States government (government) (defendant) issued a revenue ruling requiring private schools to have admissions policies that did not discriminate based on race in order to qualify for charitable tax-exempt status. The government determined that the University did not meet the requirements of the revenue ruling, and revoked the University’s tax-exempt status. The University filed suit against the government in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking a refund of taxes that the University had paid pursuant to the revenue ruling. The district court entered judgment for the University, ruling that the revocation of its tax-exempt status was not authorized under federal tax law and violated its First Amendment rights under the Constitution. The government appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court of appeals reversed, ruling that the government had not erred in limiting the tax exemption to schools with a charitable purpose. The court of appeals found that the University had not met this requirement because its racially discriminatory policies were unconstitutional and in violation of public policy, and therefore were not charitable. The court of appeals also rejected the University’s argument that the government had violated the University’s First Amendment rights by denying it tax-exempt status. As a result, the court of appeals remanded the case to the district court with instructions to dismiss the University’s claim for a tax refund. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.