Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Boone v. Boozman

217 F. Supp. 2d 938 (2002)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

Boone v. Boozman

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

217 F. Supp. 2d 938 (2002)

Facts

Cynthia Boone (plaintiff) requested that her daughter receive a religious exemption to Arkansas’s compulsory immunization requirement for students. The religious exemption provided that a parent could receive an exemption for her child if the immunization conflicted with the practices of the parent’s recognized church or religion. Under the direction of Director Fay Boozman of the Arkansas Department of Health (the department) (defendant), employees screened individuals applying for exemptions to ensure that the individuals practiced a recognized religion. After Boone was not granted the exemption, she filed an action against the department in federal district court. Boone claimed that she had received revelations from God indicating that immunizations were associated with the devil and that the department had violated the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Boone also argued that the compulsory immunization requirement violated the First Amendment and Boone’s due-process rights because it interfered with her right to make medical decisions for her child. The department, along with the Cabot School District (collectively, the department) (defendant), argued that both the religious-exemption and the compulsory-immunization laws were constitutional, and that Boone was not entitled to a religious exemption. Both the department and Boone submitted motions for summary judgment. The court considered the motions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wright, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 620,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership