Bowoto v. Chevron Texaco Corp.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
312 F. Supp. 2d 1229 (2004)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Five Nigerians including Larry Bowoto (plaintiffs) alleged American corporations ChevronTexaco Corporation (CVX) and subsidiary ChevronTexaco Overseas Petroleum, Inc. (CTOP) (defendants) contributed to human-rights abuses in Nigeria. CTOP subsidiary Chevron Nigeria Limited (CNL) operated a joint venture with Nigeria’s state oil company. CVX, CTOP, and CNL allegedly acted together in recruiting Nigerian military and police to fire weapons at Nigerian protestors on a Chevron oil platform, killing two, and detaining and torturing a protest leader. Six months later, Chevron helicopter pilots transporting Nigerian military or police allegedly flew over two villages and gunned down villagers, killing two. Thirty minutes later, CNL sea trucks with CNL personnel and Nigerian military allegedly opened fire on the second village, killing several people. The claimants alleged CVX and CTOP had an agency relationship with CNL because Nigerian oil production accounted for large percentages of their overall revenues, they often swapped managers and directors, CVX and CTOP selected CNL officers, a corporate committee monitored and planned the subsidiaries’ security operations, and the three entities communicated daily with particularly sharp increases during the attacks. The claimants also alleged CVX and CTOP ratified the attacks by launching a media campaign disguising CNL’s complicity and “covered up” for their own benefit instead of disavowing involvement. CVX and CTOP requested summary judgment finding them not liable for CNL’s actions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Illston, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.