From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Bragg v. Linden Research Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
487 F. Supp. 2d 593 (2007)
Linden Research Inc. (Linden) (defendant) was the operator of an online role-playing game called Second Life. Second Life is a virtual world wherein players use avatars to interact with other players. Using their avatars, players can form business ventures and use virtual Second Life currency to buy and sell property. Players pay taxes on virtual property in real money to Linden. In order to play Second Life, players must agree to its Terms of Service. To do so, players click a button to accept the terms. If players do not click the button, they cannot participate in Second Life. Second Life’s Terms of Service contained an arbitration clause hidden in its “General Provisions.” The arbitration clause required disputes to be arbitrated in San Francisco, and permitted Linden to modify the clause. Additionally, the arbitration clause required complainants to share the arbitration fees, and to keep arbitrations confidential. Generally, the Terms of Service permitted Linden at its discretion to suspend a player’s account, to refuse to allow a player to participate in Second Life, and to withhold players’ money. March Bragg (plaintiff) played Second Life and purchased virtual properties. Bragg purchased a parcel of land called “Taessot” for $300. Linden believed that Bragg had purchased Taessot improperly, and took Taessot away from Bragg. Further, Linden froze Bragg’s Second Life account, in effect confiscating Bragg’s other virtual properties and his virtual currency. Bragg sued Linden in Pennsylvania. Linden moved to compel Bragg to arbitrate in California pursuant to the arbitration clause in Second Life’s Terms of Service.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Robreno, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.