Brevet International, Inc. v. Great Plains Luggage Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
604 N.W.2d 268 (2000)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Brevet International, Inc. (plaintiff) sued golf-bag manufacturer Great Plains Luggage Company (Great Plains) and its principal officers, directors, and shareholders Christopher Crosby, W. Greg Coward, and Alan Krutsch (defendants) to collect a $35,000 management-consulting fee. Great Plains’ manufacturing plant was struggling to make golf bags efficiently enough to ensure prompt delivery to customers. Brevet president Donald MacKintosh met with Crosby and orally agreed that Brevet would provide management-consulting services. The two agreed Brevet would charge a $35,000 fee and be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses. For three months Brevet consultants worked with the plant manager installing a management system. Brevet submitted weekly invoices for its expenses addressed to “Chris Crosby, The Great Plains Luggage Company.” Great Plains paid the invoices using corporate checks without Brevet objecting but did not pay the $35,000 fee. Brevet alleged it contracted with Crosby, Coward, and Krutsch individually, or alternatively, that the corporate veil should be pierced to hold them personally liable for Great Plains’ debt. The principals countered that Great Plains was a lawfully formed corporation registered with the South Dakota secretary of state. Despite some irregular recordkeeping, the trial court found Brevet had not shown the level of fraud, injustice, or inequitable consequences required to pierce the corporate veil and granted partial summary judgment refusing to hold the principals liable. Brevet appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Miller, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.