Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
United States Supreme Court
556 U.S. 599 (2009)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Shell Oil Company (Shell) (defendant) supplied Brown & Bryant, Inc. (B&B) (defendant), an agricultural chemical distribution business, with pesticides and other hazardous chemicals. Chemical spills and leaks often occurred when the pesticides were transferred from Shell’s tanker trucks to B&B’s bulk storage tanks. As a result, chemicals seeped into the soil and contaminated the groundwater at the site and on an adjacent parcel of land owned by the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company (Railroads) (defendant). Shell was aware of the spills and took some remedial measures to ensure safe handling of the chemicals. Nevertheless, the spills continued. The State of California and the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (plaintiffs) filed suit against defendants in federal court to recoup more than $8 million in cleanup costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The district court and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held for the State and EPA and found that Shell liable as an “arranger” for the disposal of hazardous waste with knowledge of the spills and subsequent contamination. Additionally, the district court apportioned cleanup costs on the Railroads at 9 percent rather than imposing joint and several liability. The parties appealed various portions of the lower courts’ decisions. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.