Busch v. Carpenter
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
827 F.2d 653 (1987)
Sonic Petroleum, Inc. (Sonic) was incorporated in Utah in October 1980. It set up and maintained its offices and records in Utah. In October and November, Sonic publicly offered stock to Utah residents. Sonic had not conducted business anywhere prior to this offering. Sonic registered its public offering with the State of Utah, but not with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Only Utah residents purchased this stock. On May 25, 1981, Sonic agreed to merge with an Illinois company. The merged entity deposited the majority of the proceeds from the Sonic offering in Illinois. Paul and Linda Busch (plaintiffs) purchased Sonic stock on June 26, 1981. The Busches brought suit against Sonic officers and directors Craig Carpenter, George Jensen, and Ronald Burnett (defendants) (collectively, Sonic). Sonic claimed that it was exempt from federal registration under the intrastate exemption. The trial court granted Sonic’s motion for summary judgment. The Busches appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.