Bush v. St. Louis Rams
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
2016 WL 3125869 (2016)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
Reggie Bush (plaintiff) was a running back in the National Football League (NFL). Bush was playing in a game against the St. Louis Rams (defendant) in the Rams’ stadium. During the game, Bush attempted to slow down after running out of bounds. Bush then slipped on a concrete surface that surrounded the turf playing field. Bush suffered a season-ending knee injury due to the slip. Bush brought suit against the Rams, claiming the abrupt change in surface was not reasonably safe. Bush stated that the team created an unreasonable risk of injury due to their negligent maintenance of this dangerous condition. Bush’s claim was based on state tort law and he brought suit in state court. The Rams responded by removing the suit to the federal courts on the grounds that the NFL’s collective-bargaining agreement governed the terms of Bush’s employment. As such, the Rams claimed, Bush’s state law claim was preempted under federal labor law. Bush moved to remand the case to state court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.