Butner v. United States
United States Supreme Court
440 U.S. 48 (1979)
In May 1973, Golden Enterprises, Inc. (Golden) filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. The bankruptcy court consolidated a number of liens on North Carolina real estate held by Golden. Out of that action, Butner (plaintiff) obtained a second mortgage securing a debt of $360,000. In April 1974, the court appointed an agent, upon Golden’s motion, to collect rents on the mortgaged property in order to pay, in the following order, tax liabilities, first mortgage obligations, insurance premiums, and second mortgage obligations. In February 1975, Golden was adjudicated bankrupt and a federal bankruptcy trustee (defendant) was appointed. The trustee was ordered to collect and retain rents for purposes to be determined by the court. In November 1975, after various delays, the mortgaged property was sold to Butner for $174,000. Thus, Butner was still owed a balance of $186,000. As of the sale date, the trustee held a fund of nearly $163,000 from rents collected. In December 1975, Butner moved the court to have the fund applied to his outstanding balance. Prior to his motion, Butner had never expressly claimed or received a security interest in the rents. The bankruptcy court denied the motion, ruling that Butner’s balance should be treated as an unsecured claim. The district court reversed. The court of appeals reversed the district court’s judgment and reinstated that of the bankruptcy court. In each instance, the reviewing court applied North Carolina law, with disagreements among them as to how the facts should be interpreted thereunder. Butner petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.