Butterfield v. Forrester
King’s Bench
11 East. 60, 103 Eng. Rep. 926 (1809)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
In the course of repairing his house, Forrester (defendant) placed a pole across a public road. This created a partial obstruction of the road, but left some parts of the road unobstructed. That evening, Butterfield (plaintiff) left a public house and began riding his horse extremely hard down the road. The obstruction caused by Forrester was visible from one hundred yards away to a person exercising ordinary care. However, Butterfield was riding so hard as to not be exercising ordinary care and did not see the obstruction. He crashed into it, was thrown from his horse, and experienced severe injuries. Butterfield brought suit for damages against Forrester. At trial, the jury found Butterfield was not riding with ordinary care, and issued a verdict for Forrester. Butterfield appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lord Ellenborough, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.