C.R.A. Realty Corp. v. Crotty
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
878 F.2d 562 (1989)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Joseph Crotty (defendant) was a vice president of United Artists Communications, Inc. (United Artists), a film-distribution company. Before being elected a vice president, Crotty was the head film buyer for United Artists’ western division. In that role, Crotty managed a staff and was given substantial autonomy over what films to purchase for distribution, but he did not have access to inside information about United Artists’ finances or operations. Crotty’s duties remained unchanged after his election as a vice president, and he received no increase in pay. While a vice president, Crotty engaged in short-swing trading of United Artists stock for a large profit. C.R.A. Realty Corporation (CRA) (plaintiff) sued Crotty to recover his short-swing trading profits, claiming that they violated § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The district court dismissed the case, finding that Crotty was not an officer within the meaning of § 16(b). CRA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Timbers, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.