California v. Watt
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
668 F.2d 1290 (1981)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
The State of California (plaintiff) challenged a five-year offshore oil leasing plan issued by the Minerals Management Service (MMS) (defendant). California argued that MMS’s five-year plan violated the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) because (1) MMS failed to consider all required statutory timing and location factors; (2) the five-year plan did not represent an equitable sharing of environmental risks and oil development benefits among the affected regions; and (3) the five-year plan was not based on a comprehensive risk-benefit analysis. MMS countered, arguing that (a) it only needed to consider the timing and location factors for which probative information was available at the time the five-year plan was developed; and (b) the primary environmental risk was the risk of an oil spill, which was roughly equivalent nationwide.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.